blueklion.blogg.se - Bv4 torchat may not be safe

#Bv4 torchat may not be safe code#

Ranger – is a VIM-inspired filemanager for the console. Midnight Commander – is a visual file manager, licensed under GNU General Public License. Zsh-syntax-highlighting – Fish shell like syntax highlighting for Zsh. Zsh-autosuggestions – Fish-like autosuggestions for Zsh.

Z – tracks the folder you use the most and allow you to jump, without having to type the whole path.įzf – is a general-purpose command-line fuzzy finder.

Powerlevel10k – is a fast reimplementation of Powerlevel9k ZSH theme. Starship – the cross-shell prompt written in Rust. Oh My ZSH! – is the best framework for managing your Zsh configuration. Tclsh – is a very powerful cross-platform shell, suitable for a huge range of uses.īash-it – is a framework for using, developing and maintaining shell scripts and custom commands. Zsh – is a shell designed for interactive use, although it is also a powerful scripting language. GNU Bash – is an sh-compatible shell that incorporates useful features from the Korn shell and C shell. The Book of Secret Knowledge (Chapters) CLI Tools Shells New items are also added on a regular basis.

Add one-liners for collection tools (eg.

GitHub exposes an RSS/Atom feed of the commits, which may also be useful if you want to be kept informed about all changes. If this project is useful and important for you or if you really like the-book-of-secret-knowledge, you can bring positive energy by giving some good words or supporting this project. Your logo will show up here with a link to your website » contribute. Support this project with your organization. This project exists thanks to all the people who contribute.īecome a financial contributor and help us sustain our community » contribute.

#Bv4 torchat may not be safe code#

+ This repository is not meant to contain everything but only good quality stuff.Īll suggestions/PR are welcome! Code Contributors Please don’t delete it without confirming that it has permanently expired.īefore adding a pull request, please see the contributing guidelines.

easy to find (simple TOC, maybe it’s worth extending them?).

easy to contribute to (Markdown + HTML …).

If you find something which doesn’t make sense, or something doesn’t seem right, please make a pull request and please add valid and well-reasoned explanations about your changes or comments. But to be perfectly honest, it is aimed towards System and Network administrators, DevOps, Pentesters, and Security Researchers. Here everyone can find their favourite tastes. It is an invaluable source of knowledge for me that I often look back on. It contains a lot of useful information gathered in one piece. This repository is a collection of various materials and tools that I use every day in my work. Eurocontrol maintains that the collision rate resulting from RVSM will be one every 150 years but Ladkin says that’s optimistic, given the holes he found in the supporting data.“ Knowledge is powerful, be careful how you use it!“ A collection of inspiring lists, manuals, cheatsheets, blogs, hacks, one-liners, cli/web tools, and more. “I don’t think we yet understand the behavioral side of ACAS interactions well enough to guarantee safety under RVSM,” he said. Ladkin cited three mishaps, a midair collision and two near-collisions, in which the 1,000 feet clearly wasn’t enough. He said he’s particularly concerned about the reaction of pilots and controllers to the warnings issued by the Airborne Collision Avoidance systems (ACAS) on newer aircraft.

Ladkin says the planes themselves may be models of precision but when things go wrong - and humans have to take over - all that accuracy goes out the window. Eurocontrol officials deny Ladkin’s claim, saying the ability of modern aircraft to maintain their height precisely keeps them safely separated. In fact, he claims Eurocontrol, the pan-European air traffic control organization, ignored several incidents and accidents involving sudden altitude changes when it compiled its safety research. Peter Ladkin, a computer scientist specializing in “dependable systems” at Germany’s University of Bielfeld told that reducing vertical separation from 2,000 feet to 1,000 feet doesn’t leave much wiggle room for pilots who have to take evasive action when their collision avoidance systems go off. Squeezing more planes into less space (and using technology to keep them apart) may not be as safe as proponents of Reduced Vertical Separation Minima (RVSM) claim.